Employment Law
Often the employer, if the employee wins. Many California employment laws let a winning employee recover reasonable attorney fees from the employer, and several of them protect employees from paying the employer's fees unless the case was brought in bad faith or was frivolous. Separately, many employees hire a lawyer on a contingency basis, which California requires to be in a written contract.
Last updated October 4, 2026.
Cost is one of the first worries for someone who has lost a job or been underpaid. In employment cases, California law often shifts attorney fees to the employer. This page explains the main fee rules and what a fee agreement with your own lawyer must say. It does not quote any fee: each arrangement depends on the case. For an overview of employee rights, see our employment law page.
| Claim | Fees for a winning employee | Can the employer recover fees? | Law |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unpaid minimum wage or overtime | Yes: reasonable attorney fees and costs | No fee-shifting to the employer in this section | Lab. Code 1194(a) |
| Other unpaid wages, such as promised pay above minimum wage | Yes, if a party asks for fees when the case starts | Only if the court finds the employee sued in bad faith | Lab. Code 218.5 |
| Inaccurate or missing pay stubs | Costs and reasonable attorney fees, with the statutory penalty | Not provided in this section | Lab. Code 226(e) |
| Unreimbursed work expenses | Reasonable costs, including attorney fees spent enforcing the right, count as part of what is owed | Not provided in this section | Lab. Code 2802(c) |
| Unequal pay under California's Equal Pay Act | Costs of suit and reasonable attorney fees | Not provided in this section | Lab. Code 1197.5(h) |
| Discrimination, harassment or retaliation under FEHA | The court may award reasonable fees, costs and expert witness fees | Only if the case was frivolous, unreasonable or groundless when brought, or kept going after it clearly became so | Gov. Code 12965(c)(6) |
| Whistleblower retaliation | The court may award reasonable attorney fees to a plaintiff who wins | Not provided in this section | Lab. Code 1102.5(j) |
| Employer appeals a Labor Commissioner award and loses | The court must assess the employee's costs and reasonable fees on the employer; any award above zero counts as a win | Not provided in this section | Lab. Code 98.2(c) |
| Refusal to produce your personnel file | Costs and reasonable attorney fees in a suit for compliance | Not provided in this section | Lab. Code 1198.5(l) |
| Employer tries to enforce a void noncompete | Reasonable attorney fees and costs to a prevailing employee | Not provided in this section | Bus. & Prof. Code 16600.5(e) |
Two details matter. First, for wage claims other than minimum wage and overtime, section 218.5 only applies if a party requests fees at the start of the case, and it does not apply to claims already covered by section 1194. Second, under FEHA the award is in the court's discretion, and the protection for employees applies even if the employee turned down a settlement offer under Code of Civil Procedure section 998, as section 12965(c)(6) says expressly.
Our overview of wage violation penalties in California shows the other amounts an employer can owe on top of back pay.
A worker can file a wage claim with the Labor Commissioner directly, following the steps on the office's How to File a Wage Claim page. If the employer appeals an award to the superior court and does not reduce it to zero, section 98.2(c) requires the court to make the employer pay the employee's reasonable attorney fees and costs on the appeal. Our comparison of a Labor Commissioner wage claim and a lawsuit explains when each route makes sense. Workers in the Glendale area can read how a claim moves through the Labor Commissioner's Los Angeles-area offices, including the free representation the office may offer a low-income worker when an employer appeals.
In most employment claims the risk is limited, but it is not zero. Under FEHA, a winning employer can recover its fees and costs only if the court finds the case was frivolous, unreasonable or groundless when it was filed, or that the employee kept litigating after it clearly became so (Gov. Code 12965(c)(6)). For wage claims covered by section 218.5, an employer that wins recovers fees only if the court finds the employee sued in bad faith. The rule in section 98.2(c) cuts both ways, though: it applies to whichever party appeals a Labor Commissioner decision and loses. An employee who appeals is treated as successful if the court awards any amount above zero, but an employee who appeals and recovers nothing can be charged the employer's reasonable fees and costs on the appeal. That is worth weighing before appealing a decision you disagree with.
A similar limit applies to a Labor Commissioner retaliation complaint. If the Labor Commissioner finds no violation, it may direct the complainant to pay reasonable attorney fees for any hearing only if it finds the complaint was frivolous, unreasonable, groundless and brought in bad faith (Labor Code section 98.7(d)(1)). If it finds a violation, its order can include the employee's reasonable attorney fees for that hearing (section 98.7(c)(1)).
Many employment cases are handled on a contingency basis, which means the attorney fee comes out of a recovery rather than from money paid up front. California's Business and Professions Code section 6147 sets the rules for those agreements. The contract must be in writing, signed by both lawyer and client, with a signed copy given to the client when it is made, and it must state:
If a contingency agreement does not comply, section 6147(b) makes it voidable at the client's option, and the attorney is then entitled to a reasonable fee. Ask how any fees the court orders the employer to pay will be handled under your agreement, so there are no surprises at the end.
Other arrangements, such as hourly or flat fees, fall under Business and Professions Code section 6148. When the total expense to the client is reasonably expected to pass the threshold in that section, the contract must be in writing and must state the basis of compensation, the general nature of the services and each side's responsibilities. Bills must clearly state their basis, and the client can ask for one.
Who pays depends less on the size of the case than on the statute behind each claim and on the choices made along the way.
Minimum wage and overtime claims carry one-way fees for the employee under section 1194. Other wage claims fall under section 218.5, which needs a request at the start and protects the employee unless the suit was in bad faith. Our page on how overtime is calculated in California helps sort which kind of claim you have.
FEHA fee awards are discretionary under section 12965(c)(6), and they come after the Civil Rights Department step; our guide to filing a Civil Rights Department complaint explains it. Whistleblower claims have their own fee provision in section 1102.5(j), described on our page about what a California whistleblower has to prove.
Section 12965(c)(6) says a FEHA employee who loses is not charged the employer's fees and costs under Code of Civil Procedure section 998 unless the frivolous-case standard is met. That express protection is written into the FEHA section; ask how any offer interacts with the fee rules for your other claims.
An employee who prevails against an employer that tries to enforce a void noncompete recovers reasonable attorney fees and costs under section 16600.5(e). Our page on whether a noncompete is enforceable in California covers the rule.
A contingency agreement that leaves out a required term is voidable at the client's option under section 6147(b), and an agreement covered by section 6148 is voidable under section 6148(c). In either case the attorney is entitled to a reasonable fee.
For example, imagine a hypothetical delivery driver in Glendale who believes he is owed unpaid overtime and was never reimbursed for using his own phone for work. He worries that a lawyer will cost more than the wages at stake.
The overtime claim falls under section 1194, so if he wins in court, the employer pays his reasonable attorney fees and costs, and the employer cannot shift its own fees to him under that section. The expense claim falls under section 2802, where attorney fees spent enforcing the right count as part of what is owed. Before signing a contingency agreement, he checks that it states the rate, how costs are handled, and that the fee is negotiable, and he asks how any fee award would be treated. None of this tells him whether he will win; it tells him how the fee rules work if he does.
For most employment claims, no. Section 6147(a)(4) requires the agreement to state that the fee is not set by law and is negotiable between attorney and client.
They can. Section 12965(c)(6) lets the court award a prevailing party reasonable attorney fees and costs, including expert witness fees, subject to the stricter standard for employers.
A contingency or other covered agreement that does not comply is voidable at the client's option under section 6147(b) or 6148(c), and the attorney is then entitled to a reasonable fee rather than the contract fee.
For agreements under section 6148, bills must state the amount, rate or other basis for fees and identify costs, and the attorney must provide a bill on request within the time that section sets.
In the Labor Commissioner's process, the fee rules on this page come into play on an appeal under section 98.2(c) and in retaliation determinations under section 98.7(c)(1). A worker can also file a wage claim without a lawyer.
Many employment statutes allow a prevailing employee to recover attorney fees from the employer. We are happy to explain how fees would work in your specific situation during a consultation. Our article on questions to ask before hiring an attorney can help you prepare. Call (818) 244-9000 or request a consultation.
Our Glendale team can explain how attorney fees work in your type of claim before you decide anything.
Request a Consultation