Employment Law
It depends on the claim. Discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act start with a Civil Rights Department intake form within three years of the last harmful act, followed by a lawsuit within one year of the right-to-sue notice. Most unpaid wage claims have three years, a retaliation complaint to the Labor Commissioner has one year, and other claims run two or four years.
Last updated October 4, 2026.
Deadlines are where strong employment cases are most often lost. The time limits below come from the California codes and from the state agencies that handle these claims. They are general rules: the right deadline for you depends on the facts, the type of claim and when each event happened. For an overview of the claims themselves, see our employment law page.
| Claim | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Discrimination, harassment or retaliation under the Fair Employment and Housing Act: intake form with the Civil Rights Department | 3 years from the date of the unlawful practice | Gov. Code 12960(e)(5); CRD |
| Lawsuit after a Civil Rights Department right-to-sue notice | 1 year from the date of the notice | Gov. Code 12965(c)(1)(D); CRD |
| Federal discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (federal law) | Generally 300 days where a state agency enforces a similar law, as in California; 180 days otherwise | EEOC |
| Unpaid minimum wage, overtime, meal and rest break pay, sick leave, illegal deductions, unreimbursed expenses | 3 years | Labor Commissioner; Code Civ. Proc. 338(a) |
| Wages promised orally above the minimum wage | 2 years | Labor Commissioner |
| Wages under a written contract | 4 years | Labor Commissioner |
| Unfair Competition Law claim (sometimes added to a wage case) | 4 years | Bus. & Prof. Code 17208 |
| Unequal pay under California's Equal Pay Act | 3 years after the last date of the violation; relief for up to 6 years of the violation | Lab. Code 1197.5(i) |
| Penalties for a bounced paycheck or for refusing access to payroll or personnel records | 1 year | Labor Commissioner; Code Civ. Proc. 340(a) |
| Waiting time penalty for late final pay | Same deadline as the wages it comes from | Lab. Code 203(b) |
| Retaliation complaint to the Labor Commissioner (for example, fired after a wage complaint) | 1 year from the violation; may be extended for good cause | Lab. Code 98.7(a)(1) |
| Appeal of a Labor Commissioner wage award to the Superior Court | 10 days after service under the statute; the Labor Commissioner counts 15 days from the date on the certificate of mailing (20 if mailed out of state) | Lab. Code 98.2(a); Labor Commissioner |
| Wrongful termination in violation of public policy (a tort claim) | 2 years | Code Civ. Proc. 335.1; CACI 2430 |
Deadlines are sometimes extended or paused, and a few of those rules are explained below. Do not count on an exception without advice: the safe course is to treat the shortest deadline that could apply as the real one.
The Civil Rights Department (CRD) says that in employment cases you must submit an intake form within three years of the date you were last harmed. Under Government Code section 12960(b), filing the intake form counts as filing the complaint, and the verified complaint relates back to that date. The CRD adds that an unfinished complaint stays in its online system for 30 days, so starting the form is not the same as filing it.
A change that took effect on January 1, 2026 pauses the time to file a civil action under the statutes that section lists, such as California's Equal Pay Act (Labor Code section 1197.5), while the CRD complaint is pending, until one year after the department closes its investigation (section 12960(f)). It does not revive claims that had already expired. We walk through the filing steps on our page about filing a discrimination complaint with the Civil Rights Department.
A lawsuit under the Fair Employment and Housing Act must be filed within one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice (Government Code section 12965(c)(1)(D)). If you do not ask for a notice, the CRD must issue one when it completes its investigation and no later than one year after the complaint was filed (section 12965(c)(1)(A)). If the same charge was also filed with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the one-year period can be extended in the situations described in section 12965(e) and (f). Write the date of your notice down the day it arrives.
An immediate right-to-sue notice ends the CRD's role: the department says it will not investigate the complaint, even if you later decide not to sue, and it will not file the complaint with the federal agency for you.
The Labor Commissioner lists three years for minimum wage, overtime, unpaid rest and meal breaks, sick leave, illegal deductions and unreimbursed expenses; two years for an oral promise to pay more than the minimum wage; four years for a written contract; and one year for penalties for a bounced check or for refusing access to payroll or personnel records. Penalties tied to wages follow the wages: the waiting time penalty can be sued for any time before the deadline on the underlying wages expires (Labor Code section 203(b)), and the same is true of liquidated damages for unpaid minimum wage (Labor Code section 1194.2(a)).
Because older pay periods drop off as time passes, waiting usually means recovering less, not just risking the whole claim. If you are deciding where to file, read our comparison of a Labor Commissioner wage claim and a lawsuit.
If you were fired or punished for asserting a right the Labor Commissioner enforces, you can file a retaliation complaint with that office within one year of the violation, and the period can be extended for good cause (Labor Code section 98.7(a)(1)). While that complaint is pending, any time limit for you to bring the claim in court is paused until the Labor Commissioner issues its determination (section 98.7(d)(1)). The law also says you are not required to use that administrative process before going to court (section 98.7(g)).
Wrongful termination in violation of public policy is a claim the courts created for firings that break a fundamental public policy, such as firing someone for refusing to break the law. The Judicial Council's jury instruction on this claim (CACI 2430) cites the California Supreme Court's description of it as a tort action, and Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1 sets two years for an injury caused by another's wrongful act. Treat two years as the deadline to watch. Firings for reporting illegal conduct can also be brought under Labor Code section 1102.5; see what a California whistleblower has to prove.
The Los Angeles Superior Court's filing location form (LASC CIV 109, revised April 2026) lets wrongful termination and other employment complaints be filed in the Central District downtown or in the district where the claim arose. Class actions must be filed at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse in the Central District, and our guide to a civil case at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse explains the first months after filing. An appeal from a Labor Commissioner award is filed according to the location of the Labor Commissioner office that heard the claim. Our page for employment claims in Los Angeles County lists the agencies and courts in one place.
The table gives the starting point. These facts can move a deadline earlier, later, or onto a different track.
The CRD filing period can be extended by up to 90 days for a person who first learned the facts of the unlawful practice during the 90 days after the deadline passed (Government Code section 12960(e)(6)(A)). That is a narrow rule, not a general discovery delay, and it should not be relied on without advice.
For a person who was a minor, the filing period can be extended to one year after turning 18 (section 12960(e)(6)(D)). Workers 40 and older face a different question: whether an age claim also belongs with the federal agency, which our page on age discrimination in a layoff covers.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says a federal charge must generally be filed within 300 days in a state like California that has its own enforcing agency, and that the deadline usually applies to each discriminatory event separately. In a harassment case, the federal clock runs from the last incident. Federal deadlines are much shorter than the state's three years, so a person who wants both options has to move early.
Since January 1, 2026, a civil action under California's Equal Pay Act may be brought no later than three years after the last date of the violation, and an employee may recover for the whole period of the violation up to six years (Labor Code section 1197.5(i)). The federal agency describes a separate federal Equal Pay Act deadline of two years, or three for willful violations.
A pending CRD complaint can pause the time to sue under the statutes section 12960(f) lists, and a pending Labor Commissioner retaliation complaint pauses the court deadline for that claim (section 98.7(d)(1)). Neither rule mentions severance talks or an employer's internal investigation, so do not assume either one pauses a deadline.
For example, imagine a hypothetical bookkeeper in Glendale who is fired on March 2, 2026, two weeks after telling human resources that a supervisor had made repeated comments about her national origin. She also believes she was not paid overtime for the last two years.
Her clocks differ. Her CRD intake form is due within three years of the last harmful act, the firing, so by early March 2029. A federal charge would generally be due within 300 days, in late December 2026. Her overtime claim runs three years from each short payday, so the oldest weeks are already expiring one by one. If she gets a right-to-sue notice, a new one-year clock starts that day. None of this says whether any claim would succeed; it shows that the earliest date, not the latest, sets the pace.
Do not count on it. The pauses described on this page come from a pending CRD complaint or a pending Labor Commissioner retaliation complaint, not from a complaint made inside the company.
Usually not with the CRD, apart from the narrow extensions in section 12960(e)(6). Other claims with longer periods, such as a written contract wage claim, may still be open, so have the facts reviewed.
The CRD says a complainant may appeal the closure of an investigated case by submitting its appeal form within ten calendar days of the date on the Notice of Case Closure letter. Keep the closure letter, because it may also start the one-year period to sue.
The Labor Commissioner applies the same periods it lists for wage claims: one, two, three or four years depending on the claim. Our guide to a wage claim at the Labor Commissioner's Los Angeles-area offices explains what happens after you file.
No. Under Labor Code section 203(b), a suit for the penalty may be filed at any time before the deadline on the wages it comes from expires. Our page on final paycheck rules in California explains how the penalty is counted.
We guide clients through the administrative steps, prepare the necessary filings and keep track of each deadline so rights are preserved. If you think a deadline may be close, call our Glendale office at (818) 244-9000 as soon as you can. We can usually tell you quickly which time limits apply and what needs to happen first.
Tell us what happened and when. Our Glendale team can help you identify the time limits that apply and the first step to take.
Request a Consultation